Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761172AbYGKNwo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:52:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754747AbYGKNsI (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:48:08 -0400 Received: from zbr.yandex.ru ([213.180.219.33]:34987 "EHLO gavana.yandex.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759411AbYGKNr4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:47:56 -0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton , David Fries , Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: [PATCH 18/30] W1: ds1wm.c msleep for reset Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:51:33 +0400 Message-Id: <1215784306270-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.5.2.5 In-Reply-To: <12157843054074-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <12157843054074-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1655 Lines: 44 Like the previous w1_io.c reset coments and msleep patch, I don't have the hardware to verify the change, but I think it is safe. It also helps to see a comment like this in the code. "We'll wait a bit longer just to be sure." If they are going to calculate delaying 324.9us, but actually delay 500us, why not just give up the CPU and sleep? This is designed for a battery powered ARM system, avoiding busywaiting has to be good for battery life. I sent a request for testers March 7, 2008 to the Linux kernel mailing list and two developers who have patches for ds1wm.c, but I didn't get any respons. Signed-off-by: David Fries Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov --- drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c b/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c index ea894bf..29e144f 100644 --- a/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c +++ b/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c @@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ static int ds1wm_reset(struct ds1wm_data *ds1wm_data) * 625 us - 60 us - 240 us - 100 ns = 324.9 us * * We'll wait a bit longer just to be sure. + * Was udelay(500), but if it is going to busywait the cpu that long, + * might as well come back later. */ - udelay(500); + msleep(1); ds1wm_write_register(ds1wm_data, DS1WM_INT_EN, DS1WM_INTEN_ERBF | DS1WM_INTEN_ETMT | DS1WM_INTEN_EPD | -- 1.4.4.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/