Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756020AbYGKRTv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:19:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754356AbYGKRTo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:19:44 -0400 Received: from lana.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.3]:38950 "EHLO lana.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753798AbYGKRTn (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:19:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:19:35 +0200 From: Simon Wunderlich To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: send correct MTU value in PMTU Message-ID: <20080711171935.GA25603@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> References: <20080711124735.GA16996@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <20080711083423.64b67c0c@extreme> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080711083423.64b67c0c@extreme> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 3.2.5 Textanalyse (0.2 Punkte) Fragen an/questions to: Postmaster TU Chemnitz -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Nachricht wurde nur ueber vertrauenswuerdige Rechner weitergeleitet 1.6 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP --- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse X-Scan-Signature: 439a779e86734b9f9e658ea38d6cb1c3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1493 Lines: 49 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:34:23AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:47:35 +0200 > Simon Wunderlich wrote: >=20 > > [...] >=20 >=20 > port should always be non-null so the existing fake_rtable can > just go away no? I wondered about that too. But since bridge_parent() is also checking port for NULL, and the code calling this is carefully checking these cases, i assumed that this is quite possible. If you can assert that port is non-NULL, we can remove this, but i have to admit that i don't get the whole picture to be sure about this. >=20 > Also some of this could be #ifdef CONFIG_BRNETFILTER Thanks, you're right. I will prepare the patch again with some #ifdefs. regards, Simon --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFId5Ymrzg/fFk7axYRAr5EAJ9zm9U/mnvWlEexz2Wtx6pNu3H9QACg0t4S kovqWcfGFCxpkJA8wGVd60g= =Nqm4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/