Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 08:54:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 08:54:25 -0500 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:3599 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 08:54:05 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: jamagallon@able.es cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LKCD from SGI In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:18:30 BST." <20001125141830.C2877@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 00:23:57 +1100 Message-ID: <7235.975158637@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:18:30 +0100, "J . A . Magallon" wrote: >On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 02:58:37 Keith Owens wrote: >> 2.5 kernel build wish list[1] has a couple of entries for standardising >> the install targets. My thinking (and I know that some people disagree >> with this) is that the standard targets of a linux compile are only >> >> * vmlinux >> * System.map >> * modules in the kernel tree (not installed yet) >> * any other bits and pieces that are required to compile external >> modules against this config. > >Could the default target install names int the std kernel be changed to >System.map -> System.map-$(KERNELRELEASE) >vmlinuz -> vmlinuz-$(KERNELRELEASE) >and then symlink to that ? We could do a lot of things in the install targets. But none of them are going to be done before kernel 2.5. We are in code freeze (is this freeze number 4 or 5?). Changing the install method just before a new kernel branch is released will not be popular with the distributors. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/