Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:15:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:15:01 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:63760 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:14:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable From: Robert Love To: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com Cc: Daniel Phillips , george anzinger , Momchil Velikov , Arjan van de Ven , Roman Zippel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020121090602.A13715@hq.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To:

<20020121084344.A13455@hq.fsmlabs.com> <20020121090602.A13715@hq.fsmlabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 Date: 21 Jan 2002 16:16:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1011647882.8596.466.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 11:06, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: > I have not seen a single well structured benchmark that shows a significant > difference. I've seen lots of benchmarks with odd mixes of different patches > showing something unknown. How about a simple clear dbench? I and many others have been posting benchmarks for months. Here: (average of 4 runs of `dbench 16') 2.5.3-pre1: 25.7608 MB/s 2.5.3-pre1-preempt: 32.341 MB/s (old, average of 4 runs of `dbench 16') 2.5.2-pre11: 24.5364 MB/s 2.5.2-pre11-preempt: 27.5192 MB/s Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/