Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762387AbYGOCxS (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:53:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757316AbYGOCw7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:52:59 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54135 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757526AbYGOCw6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:52:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:51:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: David Miller cc: jeff@garzik.org, arjan@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers. In-Reply-To: <20080714.194032.117461306.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <487C09EB.1050903@garzik.org> <20080714.194032.117461306.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1234 Lines: 33 On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, David Miller wrote: > > Jeff's not against request_firmware() in an of itself. > > He's against the fact that it's not possible to build a > self-contained foo.ko module file any longer, and that > would definitely be possible with using request_firmware(). .. but is it really that big of a deal? If it were about not being able to build a self-contained non-modular "vmlinux", I'd be upset too. But once you can load a module, you can load the firmware. You just have to _remember_ to move it along with the module. I mean really, you're the one who was complaining that there was no technical reason, but now you're apparently using the "alzheimer's defense". Besides, it's not even true that foo.ko modules are self-contained. We've for years and years (pretty much since day one) had nesting module models, where in order to load foo.ko you need to load baz.ko first. Yes, the firmware file is named differently, but it _is_ different. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/