Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:06:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:06:36 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-080.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.80]:56204 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:06:27 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Giacomo Catenazzi Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2-2.1.3 is available Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:11:16 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20020115145324.A5772@thyrsus.com> <3C4C4A60.7030700@dplanet.ch> In-Reply-To: <3C4C4A60.7030700@dplanet.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 21, 2002 06:05 pm, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > I detect a slight lack of symmetry here, shouldn't it be "make > > autoconfig"? Pardon me if this has been beaten to^W^W discussed above. > > > Yes. It should be "make autoconfig", for symmterty reasons :-) > I called the files and the project autoconfigure, because > 'autoconfig' is already an utility made by GNU. (not related > to kernel) This is kernel autoconfig, different namespace, same idea. I don't think you have a problem. Besides, last time I checked, autoconfig wasn't copyrighted. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/