Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757304AbYGOGwZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:52:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753690AbYGOGwS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:52:18 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70]:12526 "EHLO sj-iport-1.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753019AbYGOGwR (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:52:17 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,364,1212364800"; d="scan'208";a="52997187" From: Roland Dreier To: Eli Cohen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: [ofa-general] ***SPAM*** InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.27 References: <20080714135009.GA29500@mtls03> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:52:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080714135009.GA29500@mtls03> (Eli Cohen's message of "Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:50:09 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2008 06:52:16.0013 (UTC) FILETIME=[513DCBD0:01C8E647] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 663 Lines: 13 > There is this patch that I did not recieve your response for. We think > it's reasonable to do this - what do you think? > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-July/052460.html I'm ambivalent. Seems like a minor usability improvement in some cases, but on the other hand it seems a little strange to change the MTU behind the user's back. Maybe I'll stick it in -- I need to think about it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/