Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:11:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:10:58 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:10674 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:10:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:08:53 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020121.160853.10161323.davem@redhat.com> To: zaitcev@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pci_alloc_consistent from interrupt == BAD From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200201212352.g0LNq5802844@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3C4875DB.9080402@embeddededge.com> <200201212352.g0LNq5802844@devserv.devel.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pete Zaitcev Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:52:05 -0500 > It [GFP_HIGH] is a trivial fix whereas backing > out this ability to call pci_alloc_consistent from interrupts is not > a trivial change at all. David, would you make a statement about pci_free_consistent. I find it annoying that it cannot be called from an interrupt. It is not an unreasonable requirement. Wasn't there some problem with the pci pool stuff if it free'd up a chunk in an interrupt? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/