Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757389AbYGONUZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:20:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755555AbYGONUP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:20:15 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.190]:2882 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755430AbYGONUN (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:20:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=vuasc3H/f3PnMqgEJnEYdA3J7dtaSiCsy5VUCstJiW1LXCYC/G8urPqLkqT+x+G1Fb I4IJ8y94V6oAJF2aQgsTAOWFWdKJ9aFQqhH8+nisENeyaDGlzx+hPCaTdYj0+HYSZboj wVbzf6wgN4//vLvo9iMNvsCEvY20U5MbRm5vI= Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:20:05 -0700 To: Adrian Bunk Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: binutils 2.18.50.0.8 frv build error Message-ID: <20080715132005.GA6517@lucon.org> References: <20080715121327.GA24533@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080715121327.GA24533@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) From: "H.J. Lu" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1844 Lines: 64 On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:13:27PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Toolchain: > - gcc 4.3.1 > - binutils 2.18.50.0.7 and 2.18.50.0.8 > - configured for frv-linux > - kernel 2.6.26 > > Builds fine when using binutils 2.18.50.0.7, > but fails as follows with binutils 2.18.50.0.8: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > HOSTCC scripts/kallsyms > CC init/main.o > CHK include/linux/compile.h > UPD include/linux/compile.h > CC init/version.o > CC init/do_mounts.o > LD init/mounts.o > CC init/noinitramfs.o > LD init/built-in.o > frv-linux-ld: init/mounts.o: compiled with -fpic and linked with modules that use non-pic relocations > frv-linux-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file init/mounts.o > make[2]: *** [init/built-in.o] Error 1 > > <-- snip --> > > Complete verbose log below. > > Any hints what's going wrong? > > cu > Adrian > > ... > frv-linux-ld -r -o init/built-in.o init/main.o init/version.o init/mounts.o init/noinitramfs.o > frv-linux-ld: init/mounts.o: compiled with -fpic and linked with modules that use non-pic relocations > frv-linux-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file init/mounts.o > make[1]: *** [init/built-in.o] Error 1 > make: *** [init] Error 2 This regression was introduced between 2008-05-02 10:10am and 2008-07-09 5:45pm PDT. Does ld from binutils 2.18.50.0.7 work on the same init/main.o init/version.o init/mounts.o init/noinitramfs.o? If yes, please open a bug report at http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ with those .o files. If not, please find out why. Thanks. H.J. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/