Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757657AbYGOQcT (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:32:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752692AbYGOQcF (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:32:05 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:34550 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752615AbYGOQcE (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:32:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:53:13 -0700 From: Greg KH To: David Vrabel Cc: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dropping WUSB/UWB from my patch queue Message-ID: <20080715155313.GA3075@kroah.com> References: <20080630180009.GA30833@kroah.com> <4871E9F0.60608@csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4871E9F0.60608@csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2410 Lines: 59 On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:03:28AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > Hi David, Sorry for the delay, was on vacation all last week without email access, and am on a business trip this week with very limited email access :( > > In looking further at the WUSB/UWB code, it doesn't look like it is > > going to make it for the 2.6.27 kernel tree due to the reliance on some > > contriversial core USB changes as well as a total lack of documentation > > for the sysfs apis. > > I assume you are referring to the usb_dev_reset_delayed() change here. > This is only required by the wire adapter code and should not prevent > the majority of the UWB and WUSB stack from being merged. Ok, thanks for letting me know, I did not realize this. > You should postpone: > > usb-add-usb_dev_reset_delayed.patch > wusb-add-the-wire-adapter-core.patch > wusb-add-hwa-hc-wireless-host-controller-driver.patch > wusb-wa-abort-rpipe-request-type-fix.patch Will the code still work properly for users with these patches removed? If so, I'll reconsider sending this for 2.6.27. > I will correct the lack of sysfs API documentation this week. Please > advise on where the documentation should go and its style and format. > Be aware that some of the API is experimental and subject to change. I > will ensure the documentation is clear on this and that the Kconfig > entries depend on EXPERIMENTAL. > > Would this be sufficient to reinstate the majority of the UWB and WUSB > stacks for 2.6.27? Yes. I'll take what you sent me, and try to reorder things to make it so that we can get the majority of the code into .27, I don't want this to live outside the tree for any longer either, that's why I started working on getting this mess cleaned up in the first place :) > > Because of this, I've dropped all of the patches from my USB queue, so > > they will no longer show up in the -next releases anymore. > > In future, it would be appreciated if any issues with UWB patches are > discussed rather than summarily dropping them. Hey, they were not "dropped" in the format that they suddenly disappeared, they are still around and useful :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/