Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762455AbYGOSPR (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756011AbYGOSPD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:03 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:39865 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757029AbYGOSPB (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:01 -0400 Message-ID: <487CE917.3000000@garzik.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:14:47 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh CC: Frans Pop , Linus Torvalds , arjan@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers. References: <1216077806.27455.85.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20080714164119.99c33d5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080714165956.7fe2d4ee@infradead.org> <487C0365.5030203@garzik.org> <487C0365.5030203@garzik.org> <200807151757.10626.elendil@planet.nl> <20080715180535.GA6080@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20080715180535.GA6080@khazad-dum.debian.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1595 Lines: 43 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Frans Pop wrote: >> If I were able to compile firmware into the modules, the problem would be >> solved in one go. > > And this thread would have been shorter, even. I hope someone decides to > write that support instead of complaining ;-) I've volunteered -- but if Linus and David will reject my code out of hand, there is not much point in writing it. >> [2] As one of the developers for Debian Installer I'm not looking forward >> to the complications that is going to cause for us and users. > > That was my point. These firmware loading changes are good, but there is a > lot of crap missing (most of it NOT in the kernel) before it can be exposed > to ordinary users. 100% agreed. That's the point I've been trying to make all along. The end goal is good, but it's not at all ready for normal users. > And without firmware-in-the-module support (which is the ONLY scenario where > the entire userspace will not notice anything different), this WILL cause > problem to distros, we will need to scramble up and fix it all before we can > package 2.6.26. I don't know if this is a big problem, though. The work > will need to be done sooner or later anyway, and we should have enough time > to do so as long as we don't care for packaging the early -rc. Agreed. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/