Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:13:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:12:56 -0500 Received: from paloma12.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.12]:53230 "HELO paloma12.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:12:45 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= Organization: DN To: rwhron@earthlink.net Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:12:37 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <20020114165430.421B01ED55@Cantor.suse.de> <20020114182019.E22791@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20020114182019.E22791@athlon.random> Cc: Robert Love , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Linux Kernel List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020122051248Z288255-13996+9603@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 22. January 2002 01:44, you wrote: > 2.4.18pre2a2 aa vm and low-latency included > 2.4.18-pre3 > 2.4.18-pre3ll low-latency patch > 2.4.18-pre3pelb preempt and lockbreak patches > > It appears 2.4.18pre2aa2 is the best overall, and the > low-latency patch does better than preempt in most cases. These are _NOT_ new results. But you should bench 2.4.18pre2aa2 + preempt + lock-break or 2.4.18-pre4 + O(1) J4 + 10_vm-22 (aa2) + preempt + lock-break... That's what I'm doing all night long for Robert... Regards, Dieter -- Dieter N?tzel Graduate Student, Computer Science University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/