Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:35:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:34:51 -0500 Received: from paloma16.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.16]:47074 "HELO paloma16.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:34:44 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= Organization: DN To: "Partha Narayanan" Subject: Re: Performance Results for Ingo's O(1)-scheduler Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:34:34 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Linux Kernel List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020122053448Z289167-13997+8048@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 22. January 2002 00:03, you wrote: > Here are some results from running VolanoMark on different > versions of O(1)-scheduler based on 2.4.17. > > VolanoMark 2.1.2 Loopback test, > 8-way 700MHZ Pentium III, > 1GB Kernel, > IBM JVM 1.3. (build cx 130 -20010626) > Throughput in msg/sec > > > KERNEL UP 4-way 8-way > ========= ====== ====== ====== > > 2.4.17 11005 15894 11595 [-] Would you be so kind to redo it with 2.4.18pre2aa2 (Andrea's 10_vm-22) stuff? Thank you very much. Dieter -- Dieter N?tzel Graduate Student, Computer Science University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/