Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764001AbYGOV05 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:26:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763762AbYGOV0f (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:26:35 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46037 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763738AbYGOV0e (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:26:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:26:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: pageexec@freemail.hu cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 In-Reply-To: <487D3056.1183.1C0E1C47@pageexec.freemail.hu> Message-ID: References: <20080703185727.GA12617@suse.de>, <487D2371.10258.1BDBBC00@pageexec.freemail.hu>, <487D3056.1183.1C0E1C47@pageexec.freemail.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 619 Lines: 19 On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, pageexec@freemail.hu wrote: > > and how is that different from today's situation where they aren't told > at all? Umm. They are. They are told to upgrade to the stable kernel, which should have everything we know about. I'm just saying that why mark things, when the marking have no meaning? People who believe in them are just _wrong_. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/