Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 02:29:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 02:28:49 -0500 Received: from flrtn-4-m1-156.vnnyca.adelphia.net ([24.55.69.156]:50560 "EHLO jyro.mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 02:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: <3C4D149A.8080703@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:28:26 -0800 From: J Sloan Organization: J S Concepts User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020117 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dieter =?ISO-8859-15?Q?N=FCtzel?= CC: rwhron@earthlink.net, Robert Love , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable In-Reply-To: <20020114165430.421B01ED55@Cantor.suse.de> <20020114182019.E22791@athlon.random> <20020122051248Z288255-13996+9603@vger.kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dieter N?tzel wrote: >But you should bench 2.4.18pre2aa2 + preempt + lock-break or >2.4.18-pre4 + O(1) J4 + 10_vm-22 (aa2) + preempt + lock-break... > >That's what I'm doing all night long for Robert... > In that case, will you also do plain 2.4.18pre2-aa2? The effects of O(1), preempt etc on -aa2 would of course only be meaningful when compared to vanilla -aa2 on the same platform. I will be doing testing here with 2.4.18-pre4-aa1. Regards, Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/