Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758804AbYGPDLD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:11:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758118AbYGPDKo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:10:44 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:33502 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758105AbYGPDKn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:10:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080715.201042.193704915.davem@davemloft.net> To: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, mpatocka@redhat.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION]: drop virtual merge accounting in I/O requests From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080715024424R.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <20080714111917S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080713.202035.172246136.davem@davemloft.net> <20080715024424R.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1404 Lines: 39 From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:45:03 +0900 > dma_4u_map_sg() has: > > if (segstart != s) { > /* We cannot merge if: > * - allocated dma_addr isn't contiguous to previous allocation > */ > if ((dma_addr != dma_next) || > (outs->dma_length + s->length > max_seg_size) || > (is_span_boundary(out_entry, base_shift, > /* Can't merge: create a new segment */ > segstart = s; > outcount++; > outs = sg_next(outs); > > So if the IOMMU allocated dma_addr isn't contiguous to previous > allocation, it might not merge segments that the block layer expected > the IOMMU to merge. > > We need kinda two phase merging code such as the old SPARC64 IOMMU > code and PARISC IOMMUs though I like the new simple SPARC64 IOMMU > code. I see. I wonder if all that complexity is really worth it. Also, all of this IOMMU allocation and mapping code runs under a spinlock with hw IRQs disabled. More and more I'm seeing that it's likely better to remove the VMERGE code. I can't see what it really buys us anymore, and to make it work requires quite a large amount of complexity in the IOMMU layer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/