Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756932AbYGPEUr (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:20:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751427AbYGPEUj (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:20:39 -0400 Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.201]:56107 "EHLO smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402AbYGPEUi (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:20:38 -0400 Message-ID: <487D7781.6000407@keyaccess.nl> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:22:25 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Linus Torvalds , Stoyan Gaydarov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , gorcunov@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? References: <6d291e080807141910m573b29b2t753ea7c4db09902d@mail.gmail.com> <487CE6CB.9090405@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <487CE6CB.9090405@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1433 Lines: 33 On 15-07-08 20:04, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Clearly, the 2. prefix has long outlived its usefulness as far as Linux > is concerned, and probably the 6 as well. Been calling the -stable branches v20, v21, v22, ... here. I do believe the numbering scheme should at least ostensibly still be feature driven, not be a fully robotic date thing. With the latter, you definitely miss out on press-opportunities and that's not even meant cynical. There just is a bit of industry around Linux and the promotion opportunities of (say) "Linux 3" are really lots, lots bigger than anything boringly date based. That even holds for things like books -- I just bet that a "all new, covers Linux 3!" blurp on the cover sells lots more copies than a "all new, covers the march 21st 2009 version of Linux!" one. But yes, the current monotic increase is definitely getting a bit boring as well. The kernel as of 2.6.26 is quite different from the kernel that was known as 2.6.0 so just be creative I'd say and set a 2.8 goal. Next version can be 2.9 (should be clear enough by then) and then watch world domination happen with the big 3.0 release. Linux 2010.5? Boooooooooring.... Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/