Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756274AbYGPE1W (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:27:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751427AbYGPE1O (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:27:14 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:52826 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402AbYGPE1O (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:27:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:25:49 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Herbert Xu Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, simon@fire.lp0.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000000e (reset_prng_context) Message-Id: <20080715212549.1c41c1d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080716040701.GA12570@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <487BE071.80101@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20080715020428.GA27463@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> <20080715113304.GA30565@elte.hu> <20080715.134407.150543177.davem@davemloft.net> <20080715214929.GA18268@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20080715151110.d7a17c89.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080716040701.GA12570@gondor.apana.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1517 Lines: 35 On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:07:01 +0800 Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:11:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Except that such a high density of coding-style errors is an indication > > that the code was not closely and critically reviewed by an experienced > > kernel developer. > > > > > Every damn single warning in this case is about whitespace or 80 column limit. > > > > > > Every damn single one! > > Indeed, I apologise for reviewing the code on a monitor that is wider > than yours. If only we could make sure that all Linux developers > used smaller monitors then the code quality would surely improve! > Remaining within 80 cols is a big deal indeed for those who choose to use, or who are forced to use 80-col displays. Try resizing to 70 cols for a while, see how you get on. And that's the point: the utility to you (and me) of using >80 cols is much less than the loss of utility to those who are stuck with 80 cols. That's why we have a standard. me, I'd be perfectly happy with upping that standard to 96 cols but I seem unable to get anyone else to chew on that bait so shrug. But for the above reasons we _do_ need to have a standard and to stick to it. (I mean it - try the 70 col experiment!) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/