Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759232AbYGPVme (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:42:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757315AbYGPVmZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:42:25 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:34780 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757182AbYGPVmY (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:42:24 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Morton Harrow Cc: Miod Vallat , licensing@fsf.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rms@gnu.org, claire.newman@canonical.com, announce@fsfeurope.org, misc@openbsd.org, ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com, fedora-list@redhat.com, netbsd-users@netbsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPL version 4 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:31:15 +0800." <20080716213115.C747F7BC45@ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20080716213115.C747F7BC45@ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1216244510_16143P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:41:50 -0400 Message-ID: <33958.1216244510@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1542 Lines: 42 --==_Exmh_1216244510_16143P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:31:15 +0800, Morton Harrow said: > I see with pain in my heart that the GPLv3 doesn't actually give the > users of GPLv3 software the liberty and freedom the FSF has been > fighting for. Instead they are forced to play by the strict set of > terms the GPLv3 provides. You missed an important philosophical point. In Richard Stallman's world view, it isn't the user's freedoms that matter, it's the *software*s freedom. > For example, as a liberated computer user, I might like to incorporate > a high quality piece of GPLv3 software in a commercial product, > which for bussiness strategic reasons happens to be closed source software. > But the GPLv3 denies my claim for this freedom to do this. Right, because doing so would impact the *software*s freedom. > I fail to see how that strengthens me in a Free and Liberal Software World. Sometimes, it's not about you. --==_Exmh_1216244510_16143P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFIfmsecC3lWbTT17ARAtrkAKCxuL4Nl5y3WKApGk76crwfKPBbKwCg71JK yHVVN7dtNX2ddG3Q2929x2E= =8eAA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1216244510_16143P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/