Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760131AbYGPXwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:52:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754744AbYGPXvx (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:51:53 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-35.bluehost.com ([69.89.18.155]:51825 "HELO outbound-mail-35.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753307AbYGPXvw (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:51:52 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User:DomainKey-Status; b=GodQF0O1thDJ0a27aIRUt7Pqwe5DZO920axI8cmPPRTpN5mFrEuakHrqzS9eft+bSmsOWZyKlcoapxorPUIDNTSKmeU5OvdduIDxcDcePq55TD1DXlmP1hTFRzfTpvAT; From: Jesse Barnes To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:51:44 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20080716214516.GA10777@basil.nowhere.org> <200807161633.01375.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807161651.44990.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} DomainKey-Status: no signature Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1055 Lines: 25 On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:45 pm Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Yeah, they're interdependent (I pulled from Len's tree, hopefully Andi > > preserved the changesets). > > Andi did not. The whole series I pulled was rebased today at 2PM. Ugg, when Andi took over we talked about it; I thought we had agreed that he would stick with Len's tree. I guess I was wrong. > I was going to complain about it, because Len's trees were always a > pleasure to pull with clearly delineated topic branches etc, and pulling > from Andi was such a let-down in comparison. Is a topic branch flow like what Len uses documented somewhere that you know of? I know my process could use some improvement; I'd rather not have to wait for Len to come back to ask him. :) Thanks, Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/