Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:08:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:07:44 -0500 Received: from firewall.esrf.fr ([193.49.43.1]:42458 "HELO out.esrf.fr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:07:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:07:03 +0100 From: Samuel Maftoul To: lkml Subject: umounting Message-ID: <20020122150703.B13509@pcmaftoul.esrf.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello people, I use firewire devices and implements it for users at work. I had to do some test and noticed a "bizarre" behaviour ( not really sure it is ): User 1 is comming, He plugs his disk, mounts it and copy several datas. Once finished, He unplug it without umounting it (what is bad, but that's not the point). User 2 comes, plugs his disk, tries to mount it but he can't because it's already mounted. Without unplugging his disk, he umounts the removed disk and then he tries mounting his one. If user 1 had an ext2 disk, when user 2 umounts the filesystem with his disk plugged his filesystem got broken ( tested with ext2 and vfat). If user 1 had a vfat disk, then user 2 can cleanly umount the disk without breaking any filesystem. That's it. Not sure whether it is an ext2, vfat or filesystem issue, or maybe not a (kernel?)issue at all. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/