Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756734AbYGQC1K (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:27:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752738AbYGQC04 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:26:56 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-106.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.6]:52400 "HELO outbound-mail-106.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752779AbYGQC0z (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:26:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User:DomainKey-Status; b=rSRcHuoQDKptPNMFIt6Flv/92QXe8dmPoaYs/b2nBxnL5/CxTfOBXRZgNMzhjclSkwoj8yJT7mtOdSQB4EGIKBjSd7TqJYuaQtvFm96JSeFFjUyPXwHsO0l6VTF81g0Y; From: Jesse Barnes To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:26:45 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20080716214516.GA10777@basil.nowhere.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807161926.45975.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} DomainKey-Status: no signature Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1509 Lines: 34 On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:53:55 pm Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Well, I haven't actually seen Len's original tree, so maybe the stuff > > Andi pushed was just the stuff he had queued up independently. I guess I > > shouldn't judge before I'm sure. > > No, he rebased it - the three commits you shared are now separate ones. Well, I could have misunderstood what we talked about; I guess I just assumed Andi & I would chat before sending out our pull requests. I'll be sure to coordinate better next time. > Most of the conflicts seem to have been due tot he x86 tree changes > though. But it seems I didn't mess up too much: at least the result booted > for me without complaints. So I pushed out my resolution. > > Jesse, can you please double-check it? Just looked, seems fine. I'd pat you on the head to reassure you about it, but my arms aren't quite long enough... I'll dig around some more for git best practices too. Based on what I've seen of the x86 tree I don't have nearly enough branches (though on the plus side, I almost never rebase since I don't want to hose any downstream users, and I don't merge from your tree until after you've pulled to avoid cluttering up the log). Thanks, Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/