Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:39:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:39:35 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:1555 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:39:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:39:00 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Chris Mason Cc: Andreas Dilger , Hans Reiser , Shawn Starr , , Subject: Re: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering. In-Reply-To: <1965690000.1011708208@tiny> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Chris Mason wrote: > It seems like the basic features we are suggesting are very close, I'll try > one last time to make a case against the 'free_some_pages' call ;-) > The FS doesn't know how long a page has been dirty, or how often it > gets used, In an efficient system, the FS will never get to know this, either. The whole idea behind the VFS and the VM is that calls to the FS are avoided as much as possible, in order to keep the system fast. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/