Message-ID: <487ED7F2.3040505@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:10 +1000
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
CC: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
       linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)
References: <20080624175612.cdf29651.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080624171809.42bbdf68.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080625003751.GP29319@disturbed> <20080627132317.GB23854@lst.de> <20080716071922.GA16777@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20080716071922.GA16777@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 923
Lines: 22

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> The tree is still messed up.  This original [XFS] commit is still there,
>> but also a revert of it.  but no patch with the actual changes again (?)
>>
>> Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to
>> Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list.  I think this whole git
>> tree needs to be regenerated.
> 
> Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull?  The xfs.git tree
> now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look
> fixed up.

Yep, I believe Lachlan is planning to regenerate the xfs git tree before
the pull request.

--Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/