Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:13:35 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
       Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
       Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] leds: implement OpenFirmare GPIO LED driver
Message-ID: <20080717141335.GA2219@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
References: <1216133032.5345.73.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080715151917.GA30607@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807161546010.12709@t2.domain.actdsltmp> <20080717041531.GA27243@secretlab.ca> <20080717140519.GA32617@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080717140519.GA32617@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 799
Lines: 23

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 06:05:19PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
> > I think it would be better to have a module that scans the device tree
> > for LED nodes and registers a single leds-gpio platform device for the
> > whole lot.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> I like the idea, thanks.

Ugh, no. The idea sounds good, but in practice it isn't, since we'll
have to handle suspend/resume ops ourselves. When we stick with the
device/driver model we're getting all this for free.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/