Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759801AbYGQSxI (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:53:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759671AbYGQSwZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:52:25 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:57343 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759231AbYGQSwX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:52:23 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: sukadev@us.ibm.com Cc: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, xemul@openvz.org, oleg@tv-sign.ru, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com References: <487F5D6B.1090007@hozac.com> <20080717181313.GA2289@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:46:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080717181313.GA2289@us.ibm.com> (sukadev@us.ibm.com's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:13:13 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.130.11.59 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *****;sukadev@us.ibm.com X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * 7.0 XM_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in surbl.xmission.com * [URIs: linux-foundation.org] * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% * [score: 0.2780] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 808 Lines: 23 sukadev@us.ibm.com writes: > > Like Pavel said, we had couple of attempts to fix the larger problem of > signal semantics in containers but did not have a consensus on handling > blocked/unhandled signals to container-init. Oh. I thought we were pretty close then I or somebody ran out of steam. > It would still be good to fix this "kill -1" problem. > > Eric had a slightly optimized interface, 'pid_in_pid_ns()' in following > patchset. Maybe we could use that ? > > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2007-December/009174.html Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/