Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:18:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:18:10 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:58374 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:17:50 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Why not "attach" patches? Date: 22 Jan 2002 10:17:37 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: By author: Daniel Phillips In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Kmail's patch-mangling problems seem to be all gone in kmail 2.2+. The only > thing to be careful about is that word wrap should be off. Since I > forgot to > turn it off a couple of times I now leave it permanently off and turn it on > for individual mails as needed. > The common ground most people seems to be able to accept is: a. Go ahead and make patches as attachments, if your MUA makes it easier; b. Be bloody certain they're text/plain attachments. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/