Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760536AbYGQVxy (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:53:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752818AbYGQVxq (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:53:46 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:29260 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751352AbYGQVxp (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:53:45 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=pKnpaP/PGiF43mj8+xTurJR+cna0lx1l7GvTcMbxISrCbbKn9GZprrCrspW00PoWdS VKCwf3TfZfuUWhpPPCqQ2PcMPLDKplpIC/WkGZRJdAL3PlnoCCh09f4bWfHkDVsYsFmk RALk8XLeilhK6EcK0Sm3K8/890X+b1J4wXxYc= Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:50:59 +0400 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Petr Tesarik Cc: Roland McGrath , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] tracehook: add linux/tracehook.h Message-ID: <20080717215059.GA12800@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> References: <20080717072541.F390E15411D@magilla.localdomain> <20080717072755.E2FBC15411D@magilla.localdomain> <20080717084818.GA5637@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <1216292812.28485.6.camel@elijah.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1216292812.28485.6.camel@elijah.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1869 Lines: 42 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 12:48 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:27:55AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > The aim is to formalize and consolidate all the places that the core > > > kernel code and the arch code now ties into the ptrace implementation. > > > > > > These patches mostly don't cause any functional change. They just > > > move the details of ptrace logic out of core code into tracehook.h > > > inlines, where they are mostly compiled away to the same as before. > > > > > All that changes is that everything is thoroughly documented > > > > This is fine. > > > > > and any future reworking of ptrace, or addition of something new, > > > would not have to touch core code all over, just change the tracehook.h > > > inlines. > > > > And this is suprising wish given one can't predict how exactly those > > "future reworking" will look like. > > > > > The new linux/ptrace.h inlines are used by the following patches in the > > > new tracehook_*() inlines. Using these helpers for the ptrace event > > > stops makes it simple to change or disable the old ptrace implementation > > > of these stops conditionally later. > > > > Call them "utrace_*" from the start? > > Ah, maybe justified, because I don't expect any other re-implementation > of the same after utrace is finished, but -- there's still the old > ptrace implementation, so _not_ mentioning utrace seems a bit better to > me. ptrace(2) will start calling utrace_* hooks and functions. These tracehooks are generic and utrace is generic as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/