Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760486AbYGRXSi (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:18:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755081AbYGRXSa (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:18:30 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:54484 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754394AbYGRXSa (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:18:30 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,212,1215414000"; d="scan'208";a="316590348" Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:18:28 -0700 From: Suresh Siddha To: Yinghai Lu Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" , Zachary Amsden , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Ingo Molnar , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: APIC: Remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives Message-ID: <20080718231828.GE4507@linux-os.sc.intel.com> References: <86802c440807180925t6fadfa58r6bf7740f8145482e@mail.gmail.com> <86802c440807181001h4426c197vc474f81497a5b42@mail.gmail.com> <20080718210348.GB24373@elte.hu> <86802c440807181413n7e79e821l90afaae86b322de9@mail.gmail.com> <1216420937.30348.30.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> <20080718224922.GB4507@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <86802c440807181551l7e6e143dy7cea8ab59f1830ed@mail.gmail.com> <20080718230012.GD4507@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <86802c440807181604y502e7deal98abfeb1ceee769d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440807181604y502e7deal98abfeb1ceee769d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 990 Lines: 26 On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:04:29PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Suresh Siddha > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:51:07PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Suresh Siddha > >> wrote: > >> > Thanks to Maciej who posted this fix. It was on my todo list for > >> > sometime now! > >> > >> do we rebase tip/x86/x2apic or rework this patch? > > > > Ingo just did the merge. And I posted a missing piece. So is this enough? > > maciej, patch will go first, and x2apic will goes later, so bisect on > x2apic will be broken. hm, ok. Ingo? should I send the rebased 30 or so patches. or we can move this patch later. thanks, suresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/