Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752455AbYGSGmV (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:42:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751279AbYGSGmN (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:42:13 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:15234 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842AbYGSGmM (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:42:12 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=mXvmPy70+mkTbtsoDN5kyBTpEOuLTbGWh1UYibmrEMTauR3MHONLZjK1R41O4mT0Ge wsADeXINbCnII3RCcUmKRrHeD/R7IxiZcvXbOtktc6CkYdAUzRoaIN45G99nxjk3wjUG oxO5sQE8SO96Hdr5J8J8xiXuaPaPSBOGPIQUY= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:42:11 +0200 From: "Fabio Comolli" To: "Alexey Starikovskiy" Subject: Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Kernel Testers List" , "Justin Mattock" In-Reply-To: <4880FF24.4000303@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4880B959.1030403@suse.de> <4880FF24.4000303@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4041 Lines: 122 Hi Alex. Well, I read the bug report but still can't understand why in any kernels < 2.6.26 I don't have any problems with battery reports and in 2.6.26 as soon as the message appears g-p-m starts to behave incorrectly. Anyway, I got back to 25.11 for now, if you have any other workarounds for me to test please let me know. Cheers, Fabio On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > There are no bad news in seeing the message, as I tried to say several > times in bug report already. We can't fix the hardware. > We only could detect hardware flaw, report it (the message), and try to > workaround it. > So the bad news would be that our workaround causes some unwanted behavior > to > other features of notebook -- keyboard, special keys, battery & AC status > reports, etc. > If no such problems were noticed -- there is no bug, and there is no > problem. > > Regards, > Alex. > > Fabio Comolli wrote: >> >> Hi Alex. No good news, I'm afraid. >> >> Actually my previous report wasn't correct because with the patch I >> mentioned the message appeared yesterday night during the hibernate >> process, so I couldn't notice it. >> >> The interesting thing is that it showed up the day after I booted my >> laptop: usually it took a period between 1 and 13 minutes after boot >> to trigger and in this case it took more than 2 hours of uptime with 2 >> suspend and 2 hibernate cycles. >> >> With the patch you told me to apply and the previous reverted the >> message triggered in 12 minutes. >> >> Regards, >> Fabio >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy >> wrote: >>> >>> Fabio, >>> Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead. >>> Same bug entry, last patch. >>> Regards, >>> Alex. >>> Fabio Comolli wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi. >>>> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice >>>> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to >>>> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon >>>> disappears and I have to restart the process. >>>> >>>> I tried two days ago the patch >>>> >>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view >>>> >>>> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message >>>> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very >>>> reliably. >>>> >>>> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Fabio >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >>>>> of recent regressions. >>>>> >>>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >>>>> from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 >>>>> Subject : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE >>>>> Submitter : Justin Mattock >>>>> Date : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old) >>>>> References : >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4 >>>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168 >>>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195 >>>>> Patch : >>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view >>>>> >>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" >>>>> in >>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >>>>> >>> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/