Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753159AbYGSG4j (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:56:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751308AbYGSG4b (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:56:31 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.249]:59088 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751133AbYGSG4a (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:56:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Az3XZ1eDjEFXtrbYh2VTgt3FFqT2EfzOUp00T7j2zruD5nEbsOmf+usDYZKIONTQKG IMxxpwIkUQsgKRAzx28oRiNaTWzwuZgS4iDpIldF0VZVh3ZONOG7mbZT5FqO7CNU48Z3 yMXFbql26GWkWIZfVcxO/c6k4GimoI9bRNxbo= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:56:27 -0700 From: "Justin Mattock" To: "Fabio Comolli" Subject: Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Cc: "Alexey Starikovskiy" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Kernel Testers List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4880B959.1030403@suse.de> <4880FF24.4000303@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4385 Lines: 131 On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Fabio Comolli wrote: > Hi Alex. > Well, I read the bug report but still can't understand why in any > kernels < 2.6.26 I don't have any problems with battery reports and in > 2.6.26 as soon as the message appears g-p-m starts to behave > incorrectly. > > Anyway, I got back to 25.11 for now, if you have any other workarounds > for me to test please let me know. > > Cheers, > Fabio > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy > wrote: >> Hi Fabio, >> >> There are no bad news in seeing the message, as I tried to say several >> times in bug report already. We can't fix the hardware. >> We only could detect hardware flaw, report it (the message), and try to >> workaround it. >> So the bad news would be that our workaround causes some unwanted behavior >> to >> other features of notebook -- keyboard, special keys, battery & AC status >> reports, etc. >> If no such problems were noticed -- there is no bug, and there is no >> problem. >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> >> Fabio Comolli wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alex. No good news, I'm afraid. >>> >>> Actually my previous report wasn't correct because with the patch I >>> mentioned the message appeared yesterday night during the hibernate >>> process, so I couldn't notice it. >>> >>> The interesting thing is that it showed up the day after I booted my >>> laptop: usually it took a period between 1 and 13 minutes after boot >>> to trigger and in this case it took more than 2 hours of uptime with 2 >>> suspend and 2 hibernate cycles. >>> >>> With the patch you told me to apply and the previous reverted the >>> message triggered in 12 minutes. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Fabio >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Fabio, >>>> Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead. >>>> Same bug entry, last patch. >>>> Regards, >>>> Alex. >>>> Fabio Comolli wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi. >>>>> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice >>>>> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to >>>>> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon >>>>> disappears and I have to restart the process. >>>>> >>>>> I tried two days ago the patch >>>>> >>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view >>>>> >>>>> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message >>>>> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very >>>>> reliably. >>>>> >>>>> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Fabio >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >>>>>> of recent regressions. >>>>>> >>>>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >>>>>> from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 >>>>>> Subject : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE >>>>>> Submitter : Justin Mattock >>>>>> Date : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old) >>>>>> References : >>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4 >>>>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168 >>>>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195 >>>>>> Patch : >>>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view >>>>>> >>>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" >>>>>> in >>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >>>>>> >>>> >> >> > I'm up to try any patches, but I need to wait until I find a fix for my linux box i.g. pci is all messed up. -- Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/