Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753538AbYGSIIV (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:08:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751592AbYGSIIH (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:08:07 -0400 Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.200]:34363 "EHLO smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbYGSIIF (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:08:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4881A161.7050902@keyaccess.nl> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:10:09 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] fastboot: Create a "asynchronous" initlevel References: <20080718151524.5ef9e29b@infradead.org> <20080718151608.46dc17c0@infradead.org> <48819D92.8050904@keyaccess.nl> In-Reply-To: <48819D92.8050904@keyaccess.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1528 Lines: 40 On 19-07-08 09:53, Rene Herman wrote: > On 19-07-08 00:16, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> +static void __init do_initcalls(void) >> +{ >> + initcall_t *call; >> + static DECLARE_WORK(async_work, do_async_initcalls); >> + int phase = 0; /* 0 = levels 0 - 6, 1 = level 6a, 2 = after level >> 6a */ >> + >> + async_init_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("kasyncinit"); >> + >> + for (call = __initcall_start; call < __initcall_end; call++) { >> + if (phase == 0 && call >= __async_initcall_start) { >> + phase = 1; >> + queue_work(async_init_wq, &async_work); >> + } >> + if (phase == 1 && call >= __async_initcall_end) >> + phase = 2; >> + if (phase != 1) >> + do_one_initcall(*call); >> + } > > I'm not sure about this comment, being not very sure about the semantics > of late_initcall but shouldn't late_initcall (level 7) wait for 6s to > have completed? Following up on this myself -- see for example kernel/power/disk.c: power_suspend(). It's a late intitcall so that, as it comments, "all devices are discovered and initialized". However, your first followup patch makes the USB HCI init async meaning that any USB storage device might not be ready yet when it runs, no? Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/