Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756049AbYGSR0Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:26:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754360AbYGSR0Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:26:16 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-126.bluehost.com ([67.222.38.26]:49618 "HELO outbound-mail-126.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754200AbYGSR0Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:26:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=UO153zczmfmkAohSjIJJTd4sSRfv/KEBwVtpM5EBJVVYBrlKCBd/vVY8ysb0ut04pVtWSvNd4NyVpwVuPTrXykYhhmw5y0NP3NZ7kuWR+Rk0C43t+Qy7R94i4VwAcP6V; From: Jesse Barnes To: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,pci: dmi check for mackpro 2.2 mmconf Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:26:02 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Jack Howarth , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Shaohua Li References: <200807180941.09779.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <20080719051227.GA10044@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <86802c440807182228u5259eba1x238ec3af5fc4324c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86802c440807182228u5259eba1x238ec3af5fc4324c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807191026.03172.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 921 Lines: 24 On Friday, July 18, 2008 10:28 pm Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Jack Howarth > > wrote: > > Would that imply that this might be more fallout of the BIOS bug in the > > MacBook Pro where insufficient address space is reserved for the number > > of buses claimed? > > that is good enough with 64 buses like laptop. > > > Is there some point in the PCIEASPM based code where you > > could duplicate the same sort of fix? I would be happy to test any debug > > patches that might help pinpoint where such a fix is needed. > > Jesse, who is maintainer for ASPM code? I've been looking to Shaohua (cc'd) for ASPM stuff. Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/