Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:30:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:30:25 -0500 Received: from CPEdeadbeef0000.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.100.234.67]:21265 "HELO coredump.sh0n.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:30:06 -0500 Subject: Re: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering. From: Shawn Starr To: Rik van Riel Cc: Linux In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1.99 (Preview Release) Date: 22 Jan 2002 18:31:26 -0500 Message-Id: <1011742313.269.15.camel@unaropia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The only functionality added to the kernel would be a a interface for filesystems to share it would basically create kpagebuf_* functions. Shawn. On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 17:08, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 22 Jan 2002, Shawn Starr wrote: > > > the pagebuf daemon would use try_to_free_pages() periodically in its > > queue. > > So it wouldn't add any functionality to the kernel ? > > Rik > -- > "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" > -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document > > http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/