Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758144AbYGTQhO (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:37:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757421AbYGTQhB (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:37:01 -0400 Received: from nebensachen.de ([195.34.83.29]:58229 "EHLO mail.nebensachen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757360AbYGTQhA (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:37:00 -0400 X-Hashcash: 1:20:080720:rjw@sisk.pl::fWerNLAaHEQBQQDt:0000002A8a X-Hashcash: 1:20:080720:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::FPr0OuCvkx1iVBVp:0000000000000000000000000000000007s1c From: Elias Oltmanns To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Freezer: How to handle timers? Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:36:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87fxq4a4x3.fsf@denkblock.local> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 618 Lines: 16 Hi there, am I right in thinking that timers set by mod_timer() will not fire once suspend_freeze_processes() has completed? If so, what options do I have to make sure that either suspending will be delayed until my timer has expired, or the timeout callback will be called as part of the suspend sequence even if the timer has not expired yet? Thanks in advance, Elias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/