Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758220AbYGULhi (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:37:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751692AbYGULh3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:37:29 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42809 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750719AbYGULh0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:37:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:37:06 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mark Langsdorf Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01] x86: L3 cache index disable for 2.6.26 Message-ID: <20080721113706.GC23095@elte.hu> References: <200807181603.52332.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807181603.52332.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6392 Lines: 202 * Mark Langsdorf wrote: > New versions of AMD processors have support to disable parts of their > L3 caches if too many MCEs are generated by the L3 cache. > > This patch provides a /sysfs interface under the cache hierarchy to > display which caches indices are disabled (if any) and to monitoring > applications to disable a cache index. > > This patch does not set an automatic policy to disable the L3 cache. > Policy decisions would need to be made by a RAS handler. This patch > merely makes it easier to see what indices are currently disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf applied to tip/x86/cpu, thanks Mark. I've done some coding style fixes for the new functions you've introduced, see that commit below. Ingo -------------------> commit 6cec0203a915739140c0a7fdf3498aa417123501 Author: Ingo Molnar Date: Mon Jul 21 13:34:21 2008 +0200 x86: L3 cache index disable for 2.6.26, cleanups No change in functionality. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c index 503c847..491892c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c @@ -253,14 +253,16 @@ static void __cpuinit amd_cpuid4(int leaf, union _cpuid4_leaf_eax *eax, (ebx->split.ways_of_associativity + 1) - 1; } -static void __cpuinit amd_check_l3_disable(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf) +static void __cpuinit +amd_check_l3_disable(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf) { if (index < 3) return; this_leaf->can_disable = 1; } -static int __cpuinit cpuid4_cache_lookup(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf) +static int +__cpuinit cpuid4_cache_lookup(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf) { union _cpuid4_leaf_eax eax; union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx ebx; @@ -271,19 +273,20 @@ static int __cpuinit cpuid4_cache_lookup(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *this_le amd_cpuid4(index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx); if (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0x10) amd_check_l3_disable(index, this_leaf); - - } else - cpuid_count(4, index, &eax.full, &ebx.full, &ecx.full, &edx); + } else { + cpuid_count(4, index, &eax.full, &ebx.full, &ecx.full, &edx); + } + if (eax.split.type == CACHE_TYPE_NULL) return -EIO; /* better error ? */ this_leaf->eax = eax; this_leaf->ebx = ebx; this_leaf->ecx = ecx; - this_leaf->size = (ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1) * - (ebx.split.coherency_line_size + 1) * - (ebx.split.physical_line_partition + 1) * - (ebx.split.ways_of_associativity + 1); + this_leaf->size = (ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1) * + (ebx.split.coherency_line_size + 1) * + (ebx.split.physical_line_partition + 1) * + (ebx.split.ways_of_associativity + 1); return 0; } @@ -649,59 +652,63 @@ static ssize_t show_type(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, char *buf) { } } -#define to_object(k) container_of(k, struct _index_kobject, kobj) -#define to_attr(a) container_of(a, struct _cache_attr, attr) +#define to_object(k) container_of(k, struct _index_kobject, kobj) +#define to_attr(a) container_of(a, struct _cache_attr, attr) static ssize_t show_cache_disable(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, char *buf) { - struct pci_dev *dev; - if (this_leaf->can_disable) { - int i; - ssize_t ret = 0; - int node = cpu_to_node(first_cpu(this_leaf->shared_cpu_map)); - dev = k8_northbridges[node]; - - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { - unsigned int reg; - pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + i * 4, ®); - ret += sprintf(buf, "%sEntry: %d\n", buf, i); - ret += sprintf(buf, "%sReads: %s\tNew Entries: %s\n", - buf, - reg & 0x80000000 ? "Disabled" : "Allowed", - reg & 0x40000000 ? "Disabled" : "Allowed"); - ret += sprintf(buf, "%sSubCache: %x\tIndex: %x\n", buf, - (reg & 0x30000) >> 16, reg & 0xfff); + int node = cpu_to_node(first_cpu(this_leaf->shared_cpu_map)); + struct pci_dev *dev = k8_northbridges[node]; + ssize_t ret = 0; + int i; - } - return ret; + if (!this_leaf->can_disable) + return sprintf(buf, "Feature not enabled\n"); + + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + unsigned int reg; + + pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + i * 4, ®); + + ret += sprintf(buf, "%sEntry: %d\n", buf, i); + ret += sprintf(buf, "%sReads: %s\tNew Entries: %s\n", + buf, + reg & 0x80000000 ? "Disabled" : "Allowed", + reg & 0x40000000 ? "Disabled" : "Allowed"); + ret += sprintf(buf, "%sSubCache: %x\tIndex: %x\n", + buf, (reg & 0x30000) >> 16, reg & 0xfff); } - return sprintf(buf, "Feature not enabled\n"); + return ret; } -static ssize_t store_cache_disable(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, const char *buf, size_t count) +static ssize_t +store_cache_disable(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, const char *buf, + size_t count) { - struct pci_dev *dev; - if (this_leaf->can_disable) { - /* write the MSR value */ - unsigned int ret; - unsigned int index, val; - int node = cpu_to_node(first_cpu(this_leaf->shared_cpu_map)); - dev = k8_northbridges[node]; - - if (strlen(buf) > 15) - return -EINVAL; - ret = sscanf(buf, "%x %x", &index, &val); - if (ret != 2) - return -EINVAL; - if (index > 1) - return -EINVAL; - val |= 0xc0000000; - pci_write_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + index * 4, val & ~0x40000000); - wbinvd(); - pci_write_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + index * 4, val); - return 1; - } - return 0; + int node = cpu_to_node(first_cpu(this_leaf->shared_cpu_map)); + struct pci_dev *dev = k8_northbridges[node]; + unsigned int ret, index, val; + + if (!this_leaf->can_disable) + return 0; + + /* write the MSR value */ + + if (strlen(buf) > 15) + return -EINVAL; + + ret = sscanf(buf, "%x %x", &index, &val); + if (ret != 2) + return -EINVAL; + if (index > 1) + return -EINVAL; + + val |= 0xc0000000; + pci_write_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + index * 4, val & ~0x40000000); + wbinvd(); + pci_write_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + index * 4, val); + + return 1; } struct _cache_attr { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/