Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:20:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:20:30 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:10176 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:20:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:17:51 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020122.221751.45130206.davem@redhat.com> To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18-pre6 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20020122220046.C21383@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Marcelo Tosatti Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:03:04 -0200 (BRST) On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Russell King wrote: > Can you enlighten us as to why it is "not needed" ? I haven't seen any > followups from Andi nor Davem to saying that. David told me the patch is not needed and only 2.2.x and 2.4.0-pre are affected. David? Correct. The 2.3.x/2.4.x branch of the code had the fix made in revision 1.71 of net/ipv4/icmp.c which equates to August 8th, 2000 which equates to 2.4.0-test6-pre2 or -pre3. :-) On the 2.2.x side, 2.2.18 has the fix. There is one, and only one change, in that patch, to the file net/ipv4/icmp.c and it is the fix in question. It is really unfortunate that the bugtraq reporter failed to even bother to mention what kernel he was using. It could have avoided a lot of the confusion surrounding this (already fixed) bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/