Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753384AbYGXHpG (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:45:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751316AbYGXHoz (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:44:55 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:39798 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751279AbYGXHoy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:44:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:41:25 +0200 From: "Hans J. Koch" To: Ben Dooks Cc: Jonathan Cameron , mgross@linux.intel.com, Dmitry Torokhov , LKML , LM Sensors , David Brownell , hmh@hmh.eng.br, Jean Delvare , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Ben Nizette Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Message-ID: <20080724074124.GB2254@local> References: <488763AD.4050400@gmail.com> <20080723191918.GC26938@trinity.fluff.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080723191918.GC26938@trinity.fluff.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1215 Lines: 35 On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:19:18PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 06:00:29PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > The need for an industrialio subsystem was discussed in > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/20/135 > > The name is really bad, this sounds like something for doing large > scale industrial process control. Well, it says "Industrial I/O". To me, this means it handles I/O devices typically found in industrial applications. > > > Firstly thanks to all the people who have contributed to the discussion > > of this in the past. > > > > In brief the intention is provide a kernel subsystem directed towards the > > handling on sensors (and later related output devices) such as ADC's, > > accelerometers and many others. > > We've already got an perfectly good hwmon framework, do we really need > to do this again? hwmon is designed for slow I/O. It won't handle an ADC that does a few megasamples/sec. Thanks, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/