Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754893AbYGXJ6n (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:58:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754157AbYGXJ6e (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:58:34 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:57802 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751104AbYGXJ6d (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:58:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:58:27 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: James Morris Cc: Eric Paris , malware-list@lists.printk.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: request for comment: generic kernel interface for malware vendors Message-ID: <20080724095827.GA12611@infradead.org> References: <1216613887.2960.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 571 Lines: 12 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:17:45PM +1000, James Morris wrote: > (I'm assuming the fundamental question of whether malware scanning is a > good idea or not is not up for discussion, because there'll never be > consensus). Actually except for the malare vendors there's a pretty huge consensus that it's an pretty dumb idea. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/