Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755580AbYGXKoi (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:44:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752065AbYGXKo1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:44:27 -0400 Received: from sh.osrg.net ([192.16.179.4]:53762 "EHLO sh.osrg.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751978AbYGXKo0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:44:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:34:35 +0900 To: prarit@redhat.com Cc: joro@8bytes.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, ed.pollard@ibm.com, epollard@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes [v2] From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <488854DB.60307@redhat.com> References: <4887C2F7.6040506@redhat.com> <20080724074655.GM31439@8bytes.org> <488854DB.60307@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20080724193457S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3575 Lines: 99 On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:09:31 -0400 Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > > Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:47:03PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > > >>>> Interesting. Have you experienced any problems because of that > >>>> misbehavior in the GART code? AMD IOMMU currently also violates this > >>>> requirement. I will send a patch to fix that there too. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> Joerg, yes I can see misbehavior caused by this code. O/w I wouldn't > >> be spending my time fixing it :) :) > >> > >> See below .... > >> > >> > >>> IIRC, only PARISC and POWER IOMMUs follow the above rule. So I also > >>> wondered what problem he hit. > >>> > >>> > >> I wonder if IBM's Calgary IOMMU needs this fix? ... I've added Ed > >> Pollard to find out. > >> > >> On big memory footprint (16G or above) systems it is possible that the > >> e820 map reserves most of the lower 4G of memory for system use*. So > >> it's possible that the 4G region is almost completely reserved at boot > >> time and so the kernel starts using the IOMMU for DMA (see > >> dma_alloc_coherent()). The addresses returned are not properly aligned, > >> and this causes serious problems for some drivers that require a > >> physical aligned address for the device. > >> > > > > Do you have a list of driver which require this? > > No, I don't have a list. :( > > But it seems that the skge driver suffers from this because this code > exists in the driver: seems? You hit the bug with this driver, right? > skge->mem = pci_alloc_consistent(hw->pdev, skge->mem_size, > &skge->dma); > if (!skge->mem) > return -ENOMEM; > > BUG_ON(skge->dma & 7); > > if ((u64)skge->dma >> 32 != ((u64) skge->dma + skge->mem_size) > >> 32) { > printk(KERN_ERR PFX "pci_alloc_consistent region crosses > 4G boundary\n"); > err = -EINVAL; > goto free_pci_mem; > } > > > If pci_alloc_consistent did the "right" thing, we should *never* see > that warning message. Well, I think that this is not releated with the pci_alloc_consistent alignment problem that you talk about. I think that the driver tries to avoid 4GB boundary crossing problem. You can find some work to avoid this, for example: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0712.0/2206.html pci_device_add() has the following code to avoid this: pci_set_dma_seg_boundary(dev, 0xffffffff); I suspect that the problem you talk about, alloc_consistent doesn't return the reqeuested size aligned memory, breaks anything. > In theory, any 32-bit device attempting to request larger than PAGE_SIZE > DMA memory on a system where no memory is available below 4G should show > this problem. > > > I would like to > > reproduce this issue. Does it also happen when you start the kernel with > > iommu=force (GART should then be used for all DMA remapping) too? > > > > Yes, this happens if you specify iommu=force on the command line. > > P. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/