Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754888AbYGXPlT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:41:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751849AbYGXPlJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:41:09 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:45112 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751830AbYGXPlI (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:41:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:38:17 +0200 From: "Hans J. Koch" To: Ben Dooks Cc: "Hans J. Koch" , Jonathan Cameron , mgross@linux.intel.com, Dmitry Torokhov , LKML , LM Sensors , David Brownell , hmh@hmh.eng.br, Jean Delvare , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Ben Nizette Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Message-ID: <20080724153816.GE2254@local> References: <488763AD.4050400@gmail.com> <20080723191918.GC26938@trinity.fluff.org> <20080724074124.GB2254@local> <20080724100144.GA8301@fluff.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080724100144.GA8301@fluff.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1745 Lines: 44 On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:41:25AM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:19:18PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 06:00:29PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > The need for an industrialio subsystem was discussed in > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/20/135 > > > > > > The name is really bad, this sounds like something for doing large > > > scale industrial process control. > > > > Well, it says "Industrial I/O". To me, this means it handles I/O devices > > typically found in industrial applications. > > Yes, industrial is generally process control of manufacturing > processes which in my view is making this sound like it is limiting > the field of operations. OK, I agree. > > All the applications we would currently need are things like > handheld PDA type devices which are hardly 'industrial' or small > consumer measurement systems. Well, though the _use_ of such devices might not be "industrial", _technically_ they are very similar to embedded systems found in automation or other industrial equipment. Many of these devices (all that have mmappable memory) can be handled with a UIO driver, but for the rest (mostly stuff connected to serial busses), it's important to have a subsystem in the kernel. I really don't care too much about its name. BTW, before UIO was first published, its internal name was "Industrial I/O" ;-) Thanks, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/