Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753359AbYGXQe6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:34:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751816AbYGXQes (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:34:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:35959 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751711AbYGXQer (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:34:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:34:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikulas Patocka X-X-Sender: mpatocka@devserv.devel.redhat.com To: James Bottomley cc: David Miller , fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE In-Reply-To: <1216913314.4524.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <1216520228.3376.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080719.210737.197246608.davem@davemloft.net> <1216565545.4199.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080720.102302.137955996.davem@davemloft.net> <1216575211.4199.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216913314.4524.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1260 Lines: 30 On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 11:07 -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > So try to #define BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY 0 for Pa-Risc and tell us what > > performance degradation do you see (and what driver do you use and what is > > the I/O pattern). > > > > If you show something specific, we can consider that --- but you haven't > > yet told us anything, except generic talk. > > You keep ignoring inconvenient facts. For about the third time: > > I run a test bed for sg_tables (large chaining of requests). This runs > on parisc using virtual merging (has to because the final physical table > size can't go over the sg list of the SCSI card). If I turn off virtual > merging I can no longer test sg_tables in vanilla kernels. > > James What sg_tables test do you mean? What does the test do? Why couldn't you run the test if BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY is 0? Normal I/O obviously can work with BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY 0, the kernel will just send more smaller requests. Mikulas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/