Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753723AbYGYIC3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:02:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751908AbYGYICE (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:02:04 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36710 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751855AbYGYICD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:02:03 -0400 X-Authenticated: #6028172 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+UqtZSAgiUEt7p4qXRom144JmysxZxP63yTNbWui wlbm0oIVeXoF16 Message-ID: <4889887B.1080206@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:02:03 +0200 From: Dieter Ries User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080622) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka Enberg CC: Andrew Morton , Patrick McHardy , Ingo Molnar , David Miller , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, w@1wt.eu, davidn@davidnewall.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, rjw@sisk.pl, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, Dave Jones , vegard.nossum@gmail.com Subject: Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference References: <20080724060448.GA10203@elte.hu> <20080724.022259.113079007.davem@davemloft.net> <20080724093411.GA12001@elte.hu> <20080724115625.GA23994@elte.hu> <20080724115957.GA25701@elte.hu> <48886FA6.6050908@trash.net> <84144f020807240544q507e1b7cv220d1afbae0ee0f0@mail.gmail.com> <48887A71.5010209@trash.net> <1216905812.5897.6.camel@penberg-laptop> <48888434.3030207@trash.net> <1216906476.12021.4.camel@penberg-laptop> <20080724115127.6cfbb616.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1216925744.12392.1.camel@penberg-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1216925744.12392.1.camel@penberg-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.58 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2070 Lines: 53 Pekka Enberg schrieb: > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 11:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:34:36 +0300 Pekka Enberg wrote: >> >>>>>> Your patch introduced a use-after-free and double-free. >>>>>> krealloc() frees the old pointer, but it is still used >>>>>> for the ->move operations, then freed again. >>>>>> >>>>>> To fix this I think we need a __krealloc() that doesn't >>>>>> free the old memory, especially since it must not be >>>>>> freed immediately because it may still be used in a RCU >>>>>> read side (see the last part in the patch attached to >>>>>> this mail (based on a kernel without your patch)). >>>>> Agreed. Something like this, perhaps? >>>>> >>>>> [PATCH] netfilter: fix double-free and use-after free >>>>> >>>>> As suggested by Patrick McHardy, introduce a __krealloc() that doesn't >>>>> free the original buffer to fix a double-free and use-after-free bug >>>>> introduced by me in netfilter that uses RCU. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Patrick McHardy >>>>> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg >>>> Looks good to me, thanks. >>> Ingo, can you please test this? Andrew, I'm at OLS so can you pick up >>> the patch in your tree? >> Sure. Or Patrick can do so and it can be merged via the net tree. >> >> Ingo, did this patch actually fix something over there? > > Apparently it didn't but it did fix Dieter's problem: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/24/337 > > Dieter, can we add a Tested-by tag from you to this patch? > Yes, it definitely fixed my issue and I have not encountered further problems with the patch. The machine is running fine with it. Do I have to explicitly add my Tested-by: Dieter Ries tag somewhere (if yes, where?) or is this enough for you? cu Dieter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/