Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756162AbYGYIyi (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:54:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752815AbYGYIy1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:54:27 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.229]:12685 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755976AbYGYIy0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:54:26 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Lv1aJUHRvNIq+RP3AriaGCi0N0rgP/GgI4Xelih88B7pn1+mTHbfMVCr2KYdHCxKvj 5K0Q6i6pbDDIjGdCA+MSl39xd6uNVp3ofRBcCwzGudhux5/M9HcD057lzGA44JC27Ru/ a7QY21vMN9ZNkfPybz0+o3Q4QO9qXpReNMLo4= Message-ID: <21d7e9970807250154q4a1958f5k45f62408e97ae3c7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:54:25 +1000 From: "Dave Airlie" To: "Jiri Slaby" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 repost #1] DRM: don't enable irqs in locking Cc: airlied@linux.ie, "Andrew Morton" , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=F6m?=" In-Reply-To: <1216975369-6749-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1216975369-6749-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4006 Lines: 100 On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > drm_lock_take(); and drm_lock_free(); are called from > drm_locked_tasklet_func(); which disables interrupts when grabbing its > spinlock. > > Don't allow these locking functions to re-enable interrupts when > the tasklet expects them disabled. I.e. use spin_lock_irqsave instead of > spin_lock_bh (with their unlock opposites). Hmm this has bounced through 2-3 variations.. Thomas any ideas what the final correct answer is? Dave. > > We will get such a warnings otherwise: > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8b/0xb0() > Modules linked in: arc4 ecb crypto_blkcipher cryptomgr crypto_algapi ath5k usbhid mac80211 ohci1394 hid led_class floppy cfg80211 ff_memless ieee1394 rtc_cmos evdev [last unloaded: freq_table] > Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc8-mm1_64 #427 > > Call Trace: > [] warn_on_slowpath+0x5f/0x90 > [...] > [] local_bh_enable_ip+0x8b/0xb0 > [] _spin_unlock_bh+0xf/0x20 > [] drm_lock_take+0x81/0xe0 > [] drm_locked_tasklet_func+0x4b/0xb0 > [] tasklet_hi_action+0x69/0xf0 > [] __do_softirq+0x84/0xf0 > [stack snipped] > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby > Cc: David Airlie > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c > index 0998723..79943e4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c > @@ -196,10 +196,11 @@ int drm_unlock(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) > int drm_lock_take(struct drm_lock_data *lock_data, > unsigned int context) > { > + unsigned long flags; > unsigned int old, new, prev; > volatile unsigned int *lock = &lock_data->hw_lock->lock; > > - spin_lock_bh(&lock_data->spinlock); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&lock_data->spinlock, flags); > do { > old = *lock; > if (old & _DRM_LOCK_HELD) > @@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ int drm_lock_take(struct drm_lock_data *lock_data, > } > prev = cmpxchg(lock, old, new); > } while (prev != old); > - spin_unlock_bh(&lock_data->spinlock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock_data->spinlock, flags); > > if (_DRM_LOCKING_CONTEXT(old) == context) { > if (old & _DRM_LOCK_HELD) { > @@ -270,17 +271,18 @@ static int drm_lock_transfer(struct drm_lock_data *lock_data, > */ > int drm_lock_free(struct drm_lock_data *lock_data, unsigned int context) > { > + unsigned long flags; > unsigned int old, new, prev; > volatile unsigned int *lock = &lock_data->hw_lock->lock; > > - spin_lock_bh(&lock_data->spinlock); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&lock_data->spinlock, flags); > if (lock_data->kernel_waiters != 0) { > drm_lock_transfer(lock_data, 0); > lock_data->idle_has_lock = 1; > - spin_unlock_bh(&lock_data->spinlock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock_data->spinlock, flags); > return 1; > } > - spin_unlock_bh(&lock_data->spinlock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock_data->spinlock, flags); > > do { > old = *lock; > -- > 1.5.6.2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/