Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:03:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:02:48 -0500 Received: from cpath.psinet.cl ([200.14.80.251]:30351 "EHLO cpath.psinet.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:02:46 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mauricio =?iso-8859-1?q?Nu=F1ez?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Low latency for recent kernels Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:04:15 -0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <20020123091643.A182@earthlink.net> <3C4F0DFA.50601@lexus.com> <3C4F10F9.87A3B2E@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3C4F10F9.87A3B2E@zip.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02012318041500.01883@mauricio.chile.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm sending some feedback ! :-) I'm trying this patch... (in 2.4.18-pre6) I'm feeling a improved performance ,as a desktop user. I'm working with KDE2, Netbeans and VMWare. Pentium III 666Mhz , 192M Ram, 10GB HD. What are the tools to check this better performance? Or my impression is sufficient ? Thanks Mauricio El Mi?rcoles 23 Enero 2002 16:37, Andrew Morton escribi?: > J Sloan wrote: > > Ditto here - > > Yes, sorry about that. That patch had a completely untested, > experimental and buggy chunk in it which kinda escaped from the > factory. > > I've uploaded a saner version. > > - > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/