Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755049AbYGYQrB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:47:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754705AbYGYQqs (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:46:48 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:48199 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754661AbYGYQqr (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:46:47 -0400 Message-ID: <488A0375.4050605@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:46:45 -0700 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Christoph Lameter , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses References: <20080709165129.292635000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <4874F30C.8020800@zytor.com> <4874F909.7060503@goop.org> <4889F5FA.1050908@sgi.com> <4889FA96.1000701@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <4889FA96.1000701@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1259 Lines: 33 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Mike Travis wrote: >> FYI, I think it was a combination of errors that was causing my problems. >> In any case, I've successfully compiled and booted Ingo's pesky config >> config-Tue_Jul__1_16_48_45_CEST_2008.bad with gcc's 4.2.0, 4.2.3 and >> 4.2.4 >> on both Intel and AMD boxes. (As well as a variety of other configs.) >> > > Good. What compilers have you tested? Will it work over the complete > supported range? The oldest gcc I have available is 3.4.3 (and I just tried that one and it worked.) So that one and the ones listed above I've verified using Ingo's test config. (All other testing I'm using 4.2.3.) > >> I think Hugh's change adding "text" to the BUILD_IRQ macro might also >> have >> helped, since interrupts seemed to have always been involved in the >> panics. >> That might explain the variable-ness of the gcc version's. > > Yes, indeed. That was a nasty one, and will be very sensitive to the > exact order gcc decided to emit things. > > J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/