Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:33:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:33:32 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:35340 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:33:13 -0500 Message-ID: <3A20451B.2A69BB75@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:02:51 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andries Brouwer CC: Herbert Xu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" In-Reply-To: <20001125211939.A6883@veritas.com> <200011252211.eAPMBIo21200@gondor.apana.org.au> <20001125234624.A7049@veritas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andries Brouwer wrote: > In a program source there is information for the compiler > and information for the future me. Removing the " = 0" > is like removing comments. For the compiler the information > remains the same. For the programmer something is lost. This is pretty much personal opinion :) The C language is full of implicit as well as explicit features. You are arguing that using an implicit feature robs the programmer of information. For you maybe... For others, no information is lost AND the code is more clean AND the kernel is smaller. It's just a matter of knowing and internalizing "the rules" in your head. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/