Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:49:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:48:55 -0500 Received: from smtp4.vol.cz ([195.250.128.43]:8461 "EHLO majordomo.vol.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:45:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:31:22 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Alexander Viro Cc: Jakob ?stergaard , Ville Herva , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002 Message-ID: <20020123113122.GC965@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20020119232455.D12692@unthought.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > All this seems very neat. One question: what about forced umount / forced > > > remount readonly stuff? Any plans on that? > > > > > > > That would be *very* nice indeed. Even if it was only for things like NFS > > and SMBFS. > > umount(mountpoint, MNT_DETACH); > > Had been there for quite a while... > > It's not a forced umount - it detaches the subtree from mountpoint and > filesystem(s) go away when they stop being busy. But for remote > filesystems that's precisely what you want. Can I umount filesystems below them? Can I reboot with busy-but-detached filesystems? Can I kill the processes accessing busy filesystems? [That was big point of force umount, I believe.] Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/