Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:21:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:20:52 -0500 Received: from paloma12.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.12]:12943 "HELO paloma12.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:20:35 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= Organization: DN To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org Subject: Re: [patch] amd athlon cooling on kt266/266a chipset Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:20:28 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <200201232018.g0NKI9Q06525@dydimus.dreamhost.com> <200201232248.g0NMmqL01292@home.ashavan.org.> In-Reply-To: <200201232248.g0NMmqL01292@home.ashavan.org.> Cc: Daniel Nofftz , Vojtech Pavlik , Linux Kernel List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020123232045Z290200-13997+8995@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 24. January 2002 23:50, you wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2002 14:18, you wrote: > > On Thursday, 24. January 2002 06:14, Timothy Covell wrote: > > > I'm confused by all of the posts and websites that > > > I've read. In particular, some of the wattage and > > > temperature claims seem outrageous. So, here's > > > what I've been able to discover > > > > > > 1. According to AMD specs, the model 3 Duron's don't > > > use more that 40 Watts maximum. > > > > > > 2. With my Duron 800 on a KT133A chipset > > > running folding@home and seti@home > > > continuously, LM sensors reports: > > > > > > SYS Temp: +45.2?C > > > > What should this number mean? > > Shouldn't this be the CPU temperature? > > This corresponds to what my BIOS says is the CPU temp. > > > > CPU Temp: +35.1?C > > > > Mobo? > > This corresponds to what my BIOS says is the system temp. > > > > SBr Temp: +25.8?C > > > > Case? > > That's my guess as well. OK, I see. The BIOS numbers are all mostly wrong. When you are in the BIOS config (the Del or ESC key thing)...;-) The CPU is running without any IDLE cycles at all. > > I think this is much to high. Read my other post. > > Too high for a duron 800 running seti@home type loads nonstop? Yes, sorry. I overlooked that. > I think that this is the expected temperature. What I expect is: +45?C CPU The sensor under the CPU 'cause only the Morgan and Athlon XP/MP have the new integrated sensor but only "latest" mobos support it. Not your KT133A based one. +35?C mobo (but I haven't anyone with sensor seen so far) Could be the CPU -10?C what's sometimes the case with some mobo manufactures. +25?C System (the case temperature) With your system load. An idle system should look like this: CPU 23-25?C (with IDLE and BUS GRANT) system (case) 20-23?C (room temperature) At any time (full load) the case temperature shouldn't go over 40?C with all stuff running (gfx, disks, lan, etc.). Recommendations from AMD and Intel. > I've come to the conclusion that the lm_sensors stuff is crap, No, they have the frame work in place but need the usefull bits. That's we are hunting for... > but not totally because of the authors. It looks like the manufacturers > like VIA are not very helpful to the project..... Very true! Regards, Dieter -- Dieter N?tzel Graduate Student, Computer Science University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/