Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 19:29:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 19:29:07 -0500 Received: from boss.staszic.waw.pl ([195.205.163.66]:51975 "EHLO boss.staszic.waw.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 19:28:56 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 00:56:29 +0100 (CET) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Rusty Russell cc: Tigran Aivazian , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" from drivers/ide (test11) In-Reply-To: <20001123110203.EB8A8813D@halfway.linuxcare.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message you write: > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:25:01 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > > > Quick removal of unnecessary initialization to 0. > > > > Quite the contrary. The patch seems correct and useful to me. What do you > > think is wrong with it? (Linus accepted megabytes worth of the above in > > the past...) > > What irritates about these monkey-see-monkey-do patches is that if I > initialize a variable to NULL, it's because my code actually relies on > it; I don't want that information eliminated. What irritates about these monkey-do-not-read-monkey-write e-mails is that I know what I am doing :) My patch removed *REALLY* unnecessary initialization, no code depended on beginning value so don't quote my words... -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/